Murphy Ex Rel. Murphy v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “an ALJ cannot play the role of doctor and interpret medical evidence when he or she is not qualified to do so”
• finding that the facts that the ALJ discussed, including school documents which reflected that the claimant was cooperative and wanted to do well, “did little to counter” claimant’s impairment in the attending and completing tasks domain.
• reversing ALJ’s credibility determination in part for failure to discuss school officials’ observations that supported disability finding
• remanding where ALJ failed to obtain additional records needed for medical expert to provide full and fair evaluation of impairments
• remanding where ALJ failed to obtain additional records needed for medical expert to provide full and fair evaluation of impairments
• remanding where ALJ did not “adequately articulate his analysis so we can follow his reasoning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).