Murphree v. Communications Technologies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding fact dispute existed as to substantial continuity where successor retained continuity of equipment, continuity of some employees, “similarity of jobs and working conditions,” and the same basic functions and services as predecessor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).