MURLIN v. PEARMAN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding plain error review inappropriate because “we cannot confidently say that there was an opportunity to object”
• finding plain error review inappropriate because “we cannot confidently say that there was an opportunity to object”
• endorsing the “sensible” rule that “the dismissal of the venire or the swearing of the jury is the presumptive deadline for making” challenges to racially motivated peremptory strikes under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986)
• “the dismissal of the venire or the swearing of the jury is the presumptive deadline for making Batson challenges”
• “the dismissal of the venire or the swearing of the jury is the presumptive deadline for making Batson challenges”
• Batson challenge must be brought before the venire is dismissed, provided that the district court provided the parties an opportunity to raise objections

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).