Skip to main content
· 6/30/1998

Murillo v. Rite Stuff Foods, Inc.

Citations

  • 77 Cal. Rptr. 2d 12
  • 65 Cal. App. 4th 833
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 7985
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5761
  • 1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 651
  • 77 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 605

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that deterrence is one object of antidiscrimi-nation statutes including Title VII and FEHA
  • “An employer is strictly liable for damages an employee incurs as a result of a supervisor’s or agent’s sexual harassment.”
  • workplace sexual harassment plaintiff not precluded from emotional distress claims arising from harassment during employment but was barred, in light of IRCA, from wrongful discharge damage claims
  • employer potentially liable for punitive damages for ratifying acts of sexual harassment
  • “A principal is liable when it ratifies an originally unauthorized tort.”
  • principal is liable when it ratifies an originally unauthorized tort

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spencer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.