Muriel C. Dyment, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that VCAA-enacted duty to assist and duty to notify are not retroactively applicable
• holding that substantial, rather than strict, compliance is sufficient
• Federal Circuit holding that this Court appropriately reviewed Board’s decision that “the totality of the evidence did not support [the appellant’s claim]”
• Federal Circuit holding that this Court appropriately reviewed Board's decision that \the totality of the evidence did not support [the appellant's claim]\
• remand not required under Stegall where Board's remand instructions were substantially complied with

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).