Muridan v. Redl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Court of Federal Claims and its predecessor courts have never possessed jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes between private parties.”
• “The legal issues before the court may be resolved on summary judgment.” (citing Long Island Sav. Bank, FSB v. United States (Long Island), 503 F.3d 1234, 1243-44 (Fed.Cir.2007))
• “The legal issues before the court may be resolved on summary judgment.” (citing Long Island Sav. Bank, FSB v. United States, 503 F.3d 1234, 1243-44 (Fed.Cir.2007))
• “The Court of Federal Claims and its predecessor courts have never possessed jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes between private parties.... The court lacks jurisdiction over private rights implicated in a dispute between private parties.”
• “The Court of Federal Claims and its predecessor courts have never possessed jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes between private parties.... The Court lacks jurisdiction over private rights implicated in a dispute between private parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).