Skip to main content
· 9/17/1990

Murgerson v. BD. OF PROBATION & PAROLE

Citations

  • 579 A.2d 1335
  • 135 Pa. Commw. 10

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • calculation of total backtime was clerical error and would not be interpreted as allowing prisoner to serve time for two parole violations concurrently, rather than consecutively
  • we allowed the Board to correct a clerical error to properly reflect the total amount of backtime to be served where the error involved merely the Board’s failure to add convicted violator and technical violator backtime together, and both were correctly reflected in the original order.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Craig, Doyle, Barry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.