Murfitt v. Murfitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the incarcerated defendant was not afforded the opportunity to protect his own interests in the divorcee proceedings because he was unable to present his claim of defense in person, telephonically, by counsel, or through documentary evidence
• after finding that an incarcerated defendant was denied the ability to defend his interests in 6 Counsel for Quick-Cash informed the trial court at the bench trial that “Mr. Harkins is incarcerated until about two thousand twenty five[.]” (Tr. 1.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).