Skip to main content
· 12/22/1981

Murdock v. Allina (In Re Curtina International)

Citations

  • 15 B.R. 993
  • 5 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1474
  • 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 2367
  • 8 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 696

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding court did not have the authority to attach out-of-state property because “[t]he provisional remedy of attachment authorized under the New York CPLR §6201 et seq. simply does not by its terms extend beyond the territorial boundaries of New York”
  • “Although [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64] . . . incorporate[s] the provisional remedies available in the forum state, [Rule 64] do[es] not broaden the remedies nor make them available beyond their territorial limitations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard Schwartzberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.