Skip to main content

Murcia v. Textron, Inc.

Citations

  • 795 N.E.2d 773
  • 342 Ill. App. 3d 433
  • 277 Ill. Dec. 105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing Ocasek and noting that in that case the court found that “the dual capacity doctrine is not applicable simply because the employers’ additional capacity creates obligations to the general public”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoffman, South, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.