· 5/5/1983
Murch v. Brown
Citations
- 304 S.E.2d 750
- 166 Ga. App. 538
- 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2237
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- 18-year-old daughter living at home and “subject to her parents’ general supervision” could fall within family purpose doctrine
- evidence that daughter lived at home and subject to parents’ general supervision created inference that father had right to exercise authority and control over use of car and conclusory statements of father and child to the contrary did not eliminate that inference
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pope, Quillian, Sognier
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.