Skip to main content
· 5/5/1983

Murch v. Brown

Citations

  • 304 S.E.2d 750
  • 166 Ga. App. 538
  • 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2237

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • 18-year-old daughter living at home and “subject to her parents’ general supervision” could fall within family purpose doctrine
  • evidence that daughter lived at home and subject to parents’ general supervision created inference that father had right to exercise authority and control over use of car and conclusory statements of father and child to the contrary did not eliminate that inference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pope, Quillian, Sognier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.