Muratore v. Darr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims for malfeasance or breach of fiduciary duty as trustee, such as a claim arising from the liquidation of assets, require leave of the court
• holding that district courts cannot refer cases to bankruptcy court if the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction
• holding that § 959(a) applies only to “acts or transactions in conducting the debtor’s business in the ordinary sense of the words or in pursuing that business as an operating enterprise”
• holding that the Barton doctrine applies even after the case closes
• holding that the Barton doctrine applies even after the case closes
• holding that, because “[debtor] bases his complaint on the trustee’s alleged misconduct in liquidating and administering the estate’s property, and not on tortious acts committed in the furtherance of [debtor’s] leasing or mortgage and real estate business, section 959(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).