Murat v. South Bend Lodge No. 235 of the Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to apply contemporaneous document doctrine because deeds at issue served different purposes and did not cross-reference each other, and there was no evidence that parties intended them to form unitary contract
• \[T]he [contemporaneous document doctrine] should be applied cautiously when the documents involve different parties.\
• \[T]he [contemporaneous document doctrine] should be applied cautiously when the documents involve different parties.\
• evaluating whether easement specified its width to apply this doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).