Murali Ponnapula v. Immanuel Wright
Syllabus
Following a motor vehicle accident, Appellant/the insured brought a breach of contract claim against Appellee/the automobile insurer. In a motion for summary judgment, Appellee argued that Appellant materially breached the duty to cooperate clause of the insurance policy, which barred his recovery. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Appellee, finding that there was no genuine issue of material fact that Appellant materially breached the insurance policy by failing to submit to an examination under oath. The trial court concluded that the material breach barred Appellant from recovery under the policy. Appellant appeals. Discerning no error, we affirm and remand.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that three and one-half years between prior arrest and instant arrest were \well within permissible time boundaries for the introduction of Rule 404(b) evidence\
- explaining the requirements of the Jencks Act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.