Murakami v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Court of Federal Claims correctly concluded that plaintiff waived his argument concerning his father’s constructive travel restriction by not first raising the argument with the administrative agency
• holding that the United States Court of Federal Claims correctly concluded that plaintiff waived his argument concerning his father’s constructive travel restriction by not first raising the argument with the administrative agency
• affirming determination that a plaintiff who fails to raise an argument before a military corrections board is precluded from raising that issue for the first time before the Court of Federal Claims
• using a dictionary to define the phrase \as a result of\
• “The focus of judicial review of agency action remains the administrative . record, which should be supplemented only if the existing record is insufficient to permit meaningful review consistent with the APA.”
• “[L]est the admission of evidence not considered by the agency below and its consideration by the court convert the ‘arbitrary and capricious’ standard into effectively de novo review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).