Muolo v. Quintana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an action in another tribunal violates “the long-standing judicial policy prohibiting collateral attacks” on bankruptcy jurisdiction, “thereby undercutting the orderly process of law, which results in irreparable harm”
• discussing interplay between Bankruptcy Code and Anti-Injunction Act’s relitigation exception
• Under Texas law, the court looks to the nature of the wrongs alleged, and if it is of indirect harm to the equity holder, through a diminution of the value of its interest by virtue of harm inflicted on the entity, the claim is derivative.
• Under Texas law, the court looks to the nature of the wrongs alleged, and if it is of indirect harm to the equity holder, through a diminution of the value of its interest by virtue of harm inflicted on the entity, the claim is derivative.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).