MUNZERT, TIMOTHY C., PEOPLE v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the presumption that Congress “intends [its amendments] to have real and substantial effect” is a corollary of the canon against superfluity (quoting Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. 632, 641– 42 (2016))
• noting “guidance documents lack the force of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).