Muntz v. Jefferson Ry. Co.
Citations
- 114 La. 860
- 38 So. 586
- 1905 La. LEXIS 556
Syllabus
<p>APPEAL — JURISDICTION—DISMISSAL.</p> <p>1. Where, in a case which is appealable to-this court, no appeal is taken, this court has no jurisdiction of an appeal from a judgment, subsequently rendered, in an injunction proceeding, on a question of costs incurred in such casein the district court, unless the amount involved exceeds $2,000, exclusive of interest.</p> <p>2. When an appeal is dismissed by the Court-of Appeal for want of jurisdiction, and the appellant, allowing the judgment of dismissal to-become final without applying to this court for relief, brings the case here by appeal from the-district court, and this court finds that it is. without jurisdiction, the case will not be transferred to the Court of Appeal, but the appeal will be dismissed.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying Massachusetts law and holding that “[a]n aiding and abetting claim demands a showing of ‘actual knowledge’ of the underlying wrongdoing”
- dismissing an aiding and abetting fraud claim because the plaintiff has failed to allege plausibly that the defendant banks had any actual knowledge of the fraud allegedly committed by their client
- provision of banking services, including effecting transfers and making payments, does not actively or substantially assist a fraud
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Monroe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.