· 7/7/1978
Munters Corp. v. Burgess Industries Inc.
Citations
- 450 F. Supp. 1195
- 25 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 274
- 194 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 146
- 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16745
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- district court abused discretion in failing to allow amendment when facts were easily ascertainable and no prejudice would result to the nonmoving party
- “interest of justice” required leave to file counterclaim on eve of trial when no prejudice would result
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tenney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.