Skip to main content
· 7/7/1978

Munters Corp. v. Burgess Industries Inc.

Citations

  • 450 F. Supp. 1195
  • 25 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 274
  • 194 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 146
  • 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16745

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • district court abused discretion in failing to allow amendment when facts were easily ascertainable and no prejudice would result to the nonmoving party
  • “interest of justice” required leave to file counterclaim on eve of trial when no prejudice would result

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tenney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.