Munson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under the mailbox rule pro se inmate’s documents are considered filed when they are delivered to prison authorities for the purpose of mailing to the court clerk
• holding that, under the mailbox rule, pro se inmates’ documents are considered filed when they are delivered to prison authorities for the purpose of mailing to the court clerk
• holding that, under the mailbox rule, pro se inmates’ documents are considered filed when they are delivered to prison authorities for the purpose of mailing to the court clerk
• holding that under the mailbox rule pro se inmate’s documents are considered filed when they are delivered to prison authorities for the purpose of mailing to the court clerk
• holding petition delivered to prison authorities for mailing prior to filing deadline is timely, even if petition is not received by court clerk until after the deadline
• “We hold that the mailbox rule applies for purposes of pro se inmates filing petitions for post-conviction relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Silverbrand v. County of Los Angeles
  California Supreme Court· 2009-04-23· cited 126×
• State v. Farwell
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2007-10-22· cited 111×
• Massaline v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-10-22· cited 33×
• In Re Carlstad
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-12-04· cited 28×
• Robertson v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2005-11-23· cited 23×
• State v. Goracke
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-02-22· cited 16×
• State v. Gorringe
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2021-02-17· cited 15×
• McCabe v. Craven
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2008-06-12· cited 14×
• Rodriquez v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2023-02-10· cited 13×
• State v. Johnson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2011-05-19· cited 12×
• Hayes v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2006-05-25· cited 12×
• Rhoades v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-10-19· cited 7×
• Charles M. Martin v. Department of Corrections
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2018-07-24· cited 7×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Carlstad
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-11-25· cited 4×
• Hauschulz v. Department of Correction
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2006-10-20· cited 3×
• State v. McLean
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-12-04· cited 2×
• In re Joseph Bruyette
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2016-01-08· cited 1×
• Darrel McCabe v. Olivia Craven
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2007-04-19

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Houston v. Lack
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-24· cited 6,563×
• State v. Lee
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1990-02-01· cited 482×
• Downey Chiropractic Clinic v. Nampa Restaurant Corp.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1995-07-10· cited 39×
• State v. Smith
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1982-05-14· cited 18×
• LaFon v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1991-03-04· cited 9×
• State v. Hoffman
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1988-04-28· cited 8×
• State v. Anderson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1990-12-24· cited 4×