Munson v. Gaetz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that No. 16‐1528 Page 4 prison administrators did not act irrationally by permitting access to some but not all books with same information
• concluding that prison administrators did not act irrationally by permitting access to some but not all books with same information
• finding that “[a] prison’s refusal to allow an inmate access to a book presents a substantial First Amendment issue”
• explaining that a prisoner’s claim that an alleged deprivation of a property interest in books is properly brought pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment
• finding that “§ 1983 liability ‘requires personal involvement in the alleged constitutional deprivation’” (internal quotation marks omitted) (citing Minix v. Canarecci, 597 F.3d 824, 833–34 (7th Cir. 2010))
• noting that liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 depends on personal involvement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).