Munoz v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding appellant, in pleading guilty in 1997, was entitled to rely on language in article 42.12, section 5(c) prior to its amendment, that explicitly limited the collateral consequences of deferred adjudication
• holding appellant, in pleading guilty in 1997, was entitled to rely on language in article 42.12, section 5(c) prior to its amendment, that explicitly limited the collateral consequences of deferred adjudication
• holding appellant, in pleading guilty in 1997, was entitled to rely on language in article 42.12, section 5(c) prior to its amendment, that explicitly limited the collateral consequences of deferred adjudication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• in Re Michael Richard Morrissey
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-09-21
• Ex Parte Derrick Keith Cooke
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-09-21
• Derrick Keith Cooke v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-09-21

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Ring v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
• Scott v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-09-12· cited 87×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-12-05· cited 43×
• McKenzie v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1953-11-25· cited 20×
• Mueller v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1931-10-28· cited 15×