Skip to main content

Munoz v. State

Citations

  • 937 So. 2d 686
  • 2006 WL 2088271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that house under construction did not qualify as “dwelling,” and thus, evidence was insufficient to sustain conviction for burglary of dwelling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Villanti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.