District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/28/2006
Munoz v. State
Citations
- 937 So. 2d 686
- 2006 WL 2088271
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that house under construction did not qualify as “dwelling,” and thus, evidence was insufficient to sustain conviction for burglary of dwelling
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Villanti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2013-09-19· cited 22×
- People v. MoralesColorado Court of Appeals· 2012-01-05· cited 18×
- Jacobs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-05· cited 11×
- Emmanuel Lauture v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2022-03-17· cited 4×
- Michael v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-23· cited 2×
- Young v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-10-21· cited 2×
- GINLOCK v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-12
- Polewarzyk v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-04
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GoodeSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-17· cited 109×
- Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-10-31· cited 26×
- State v. BennettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-07-25· cited 9×
- Perkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-12· cited 6×
- Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-30· cited 4×
- Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-18· cited 4×
- Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-28· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.