Munoz v. St. Mary-Corwin Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that a two-year difference between candidates was “obviously insignificant” for purposes of age-dis- crimination claim
• noting that prima facie elements for age and national origin discrimination are the same
• stating that if the plaintiff in an ADEA case establishes a prima facie case of age discrimination, the defendants “must then articulate a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the adverse employment action suffered by the plaintiff.”
• stating fourth element of Title VII termination case as “the job was not ehminated after [plaintiffs] discharge”
• adopting the McDonnell Douglas framework for analyzing claims under the Colorado Anti Discrimination Act
• affirming grant of summary judgment because plaintiff failed to rebut reasons for plaintiffs termination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).