Skip to main content
· 8/30/2002

Munnerlyn v. Wingster

Citations

  • 825 So. 2d 481
  • 2002 WL 1990338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a dissenting opinion possesses no precedential value
  • \A trial court's determination of subject matter jurisdiction is subject to an abuse of discretion standard of review.\
  • \A trial court's determination of subject matter jurisdiction is subject to an abuse of discretion standard of review.\
  • “A trial court’s determination of subject matter jurisdiction is subject to an abuse of discretion standard of review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Palmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.