Muniz v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the plaintiff’s 25 claim for negligent hiring, training, and supervision “rests on facts supporting her claim for 26 general discrimination,” and thus is not preempted by California’s Workers’ Compensation Act
• setting out the standard for retaliation claims under Cal. Labor Code §§ 98.6 and 1102.5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).