Muniz v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that where a defendant was acquitted of theft and the evidence did not establish how the defendant came into possession of stolen property, he could not be convicted of theft by possession of stolen property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chavez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-12-23· cited 94×
• Robinson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-04-01· cited 19×
• Tuck v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1986-12-04· cited 2×
• Wilson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1991-03-14

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Warren v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-10-09· cited 106×
• Dennis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-16· cited 66×
• Pool v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-10-15· cited 23×
• Ehrman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-01-17· cited 22×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-03-10· cited 22×
• Hynson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-06-29· cited 16×