Muniz v. Rovira-Martino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the district court's dismissal of the case “because the 11 complaint is nothing more than another attack on the California superior court's determination in [the 12 plaintiff's] domestic case”
• affirming the district court’s dismissal of the case “because the 13 complaint is nothing more than another attack on the California superior court’s determination in 14 [the plaintiff’s] domestic case”
• \The [Supreme] Court could scarcely have been more clear on this point: we may not exercise de novo review over the district court's account of the video evidence.\
• “[W]e may not exercise de novo review over the district court’s account of the video evidence in this case.”
• same for a motion to set aside the judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).