Skip to main content
· 5/18/1994

Muniz-Cabrero v. Ruiz

Citations

  • 23 F.3d 607
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10914
  • 1994 WL 183934

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the statute of limitations for a Section 1983 claim in Puerto Rico is one year
  • analyzing the continuing violation theory in the context of a claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and ultimately deciding the claim was time-barred
  • guoting Jensen v. Frank, 912 F.2d 517, 522 (1st Cir. 1990)
  • “the proper focus in continuing violation analysis is on the time of the discriminatory act, not the point at which the consequences of the act became painful.”
  • “A party opposing a summary judgment motion must inform the trial judge of the reasons, legal or factual, why summary judgment should not be entered. If [he] does not do so, and loses the motion, [he] cannot raise such reasons on appeal.” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “A party opposing a summary judgment motion must inform the trial judge of the reasons, legal or factual, why summary judgment should not be entered. If it does not do so, and loses the motion, it cannot raise such reasons on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cyr, Bownes, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.