Municipal Court of Huntsville v. Casoli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting trial court’s ruling that substantial compliance was sufficient and finding that notice of foreclosure violated OCGA § 44-14-162.2 because it identified loan servicer instead of the secured creditor with the authority to foreclose
• “While a loan servicer may be permitted to send the notice on behalf of the secured creditor, ... [the notice must] properly identify the secured creditor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).