Mundy v. Shellaberger
Citations
- 153 F. 219
- 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5088
Syllabus
<p>Specific Performance — Homestead—Rights of Wife.</p> <p>Rev. St. Mo. 1899, § 3616 [Ann. St 1906, p. 2034], establishes the homestead of every housekeeper or head of a family, and declares that the husband shall be incapable of selling the homestead, and every such sale shall be void, unless the wife joins in the conveyance. Mold that, where a husband contracted to transfer his homestead and other real estate in exchange for certain corporate stock, in which contract his wife did not •join, and the homestead constituted one-fourth in value of the property agreed to be transferred, the contract was invalid, and specific performance thereof would not be decreed.</p> <p>[Ed. Note.- — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 44, Specific Performance, § 33.]</p>
Judges: Philips
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barton v. DrakeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1875-01-11· cited 37×
- Weitzner v. ThingstadSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1893-11-13· cited 34×
- Newton v. NewtonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1901-04-23· cited 23×
- Martin v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1901-05-31· cited 20×
- Hall v. LoomisMichigan Supreme Court· 1886-11-17· cited 20×
- Law v. ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1890-11-14· cited 19×
- Engle v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court· 1895-02-12· cited 9×
- Webster v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court· 1899-03-06· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.