Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/18/2024
Mundy v. Centrome, Inc.
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1001
Syllabus
The trial court erred by imposing sanctions under Civ.R. 37(C) where neither the trial court's findings nor the record evidence shows a violation of the Civ.R. 26(E) duty to supplement discovery responses.
Judges: S. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Nakoff v. Fairview General HospitalOhio Supreme Court· 1996-03-06· cited 482×
- Lynn v. Monarch Recovery Mgmt., Inc.D. Maryland· 2012-06-27· cited 67×
- Felix v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-08-27· cited 46×
- Babb v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals· 1987-06-15· cited 29×
- Buckner v. Washington Mut. BankOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-24· cited 7×
- Long v. HardingOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-06· cited 5×
- Rardin v. Salon Professional Academy, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-03· cited 4×
- Duff v. Centrome, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-24· cited 4×
Other cases named Mundy v. Centrome, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.