Mundo Verde Public Charter School v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that liens were property protected by the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment
• holding that liens were property protected by the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment
• holding that consumer lien avoidance powers of Section 522(f) cannot be applied retroactively
• noting that “[t]he principle that statutes operate only prospectively, while judicial decisions operate retrospectively, is familiar to every law student”
• noting that \[t]he 'bundle of rights' which accrues to a secured party is obviously smaller than that which accrues to an owner\
• stating that lien avoidance under 522(f) \fits but awkwardly into the analytic framework employed in Penn Central Transp. Co.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).