Mundi v. Union Security Life Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that equitable estoppel did not apply because the plaintiffs’ claims were not intertwined with the contract providing for arbitration and because “there were no allegations of collusion or misconduct” between the nonsignatory and signatory
• holding defendant could not compel arbitration 1 based on equitable estoppel because resolution of plaintiff’s claim did not require 2 examination of any provisions of loan agreement containing arbitration provision
• holding equitable estoppel did not apply because the claim was neither “intertwined with” the credit agreement that provided for arbitration, nor did it “arise out of or relate directly to” the credit agreement (quotation marks and alterations omitted)
• finding claims related to life 14 FRANKLIN V. CMTY. REG’L MED. CTR. Garcia simply applies a rule that we have (necessarily
• holding equitable estoppel did not apply because the claim was neither “intertwined with” the credit agreement that provided for arbitration, nor did it “arise out of or relate directly to” the credit agreement (quotation marks and alterations omitted)
• holding equitable estoppel did not apply because the claim was neither “intertwined with” the credit agreement that provided for arbitration, nor did it “arise out of or relate directly to” the credit agreement (quotation marks and alterations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).