Skip to main content
· 3/9/1976

Mumrow v. Riddle

Citations

  • 242 N.W.2d 489
  • 67 Mich. App. 693
  • 1976 Mich. App. LEXIS 1286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where the easement claimed was a driveway from the road to the claimant’s residence, the claimant’s daily use of the driveway was continuous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaufman, Cavanagh, Burns

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.