Skip to main content
· 8/12/1982

Mummau, O. Howard v. Ranck, Michael, District Attorney, Lancaster County, Buckwalter, Ronald, Former District Attorney, Lancaster County

Citations

  • 687 F.2d 9
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 16652

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an assistant district attorney (ADA) who only prosecuted juvenile cases and was not involved in the policymaking details of the office was a policymaker because regardless of whether the ADAs actually exercised all their powers, the powers granted to ADAs were broad
  • position of assistant district attorney is one for which party affiliation is an appropriate requirement
  • “That an assistant district attorney ‘could conceivably operate in such a legal/technical manner,’ or that appellant in fact so limited himself to the role described is irrelevant.”
  • affirming summary judgment in favor of defendants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aldisert, Per Curiam, Weis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.