· 8/12/1982
Mummau, O. Howard v. Ranck, Michael, District Attorney, Lancaster County, Buckwalter, Ronald, Former District Attorney, Lancaster County
Citations
- 687 F.2d 9
- 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 16652
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an assistant district attorney (ADA) who only prosecuted juvenile cases and was not involved in the policymaking details of the office was a policymaker because regardless of whether the ADAs actually exercised all their powers, the powers granted to ADAs were broad
- position of assistant district attorney is one for which party affiliation is an appropriate requirement
- “That an assistant district attorney ‘could conceivably operate in such a legal/technical manner,’ or that appellant in fact so limited himself to the role described is irrelevant.”
- affirming summary judgment in favor of defendants
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aldisert, Per Curiam, Weis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.