Skip to main content

Mumma v. Mumma

Citations

  • 550 A.2d 1341
  • 380 Pa. Super. 18
  • 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3523

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming trial court’s decision to give weight to the mother’s role as primary caretaker where it first found both parties were fit parents
  • “although entitled to be considered, [private custody agreements] must always give way where the best interests of the child suggest an alternate custody arrangement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Wieand, Sole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Mumma v. Mumma

12 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.