Mumford & Miller Concrete, Inc. v. Geren

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting the standard of punishment enunciated in Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 99 S.Ct. 1861, 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979)
• conditions that are “arbitrary or purposeless” can be considered to raise an inference of punishment
• conditions that are “arbitrary or purposeless” can be considered to raise an inference of punishment
• Article 13 standards “conceptually the same as those constitutionally required by the Due Process Clause of the Constitution”
• conditions that are “arbitrary or purposeless” can be considered to raise an inference of punishment
• conditions that are “arbitrary or purposeless” can be considered to raise an inference of punishment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).