Skip to main content
· 12/4/1998

Mumaw v. U.S. Silica Co.

Citations

  • 511 S.E.2d 117
  • 204 W. Va. 6
  • 1998 W. Va. LEXIS 192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a summary judgment motion made by an employer in a W.Va.Code § 23-4-2(d)(2)(ii) action is appropriate where the nonmoving party has failed to make a sufficient showing on an essential element of the case it has the burden to prove
  • a summary judgment motion made by an employer in a W.Va.Code § 23 — 4—2(d)(2)(ii) action is appropriate where the nonmoving party has failed to make a sufficient showing on an essential element of the case it has the burden to prove

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.