Skip to main content
· 5/7/1990

Mumaugh v. Diamond Lake Area Cable TV Co.

Citations

  • 456 N.W.2d 425
  • 183 Mich. App. 597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • electric company’s easement was in gross since it was not appurtenant to any estate in land, but was a personal interest to use the servient land for the erection and maintenance of a utility pole line
  • electric company’s easement was in gross since it was not appurtenant to any estate in land, but was a personal interest to use the servient land for the erection and maintenance of a utility pole line
  • electric company’s easement was in gross since it was not appurtenant to any estate in land, but was a personal interest to use the servient land for the erection and maintenance of a utility pole line

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Hood, Neff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.