Mullowney v. Masopust

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “the consumer protection purpose of the statute”; “[T]he Condominium Act contains a strong consumer protection flavor . . . .” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “With respect to the issue of attorneys’ fees, this Court will uphold a presiding judicial officer’s award of attorneys’ fees unless such award constitutes an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).