Skip to main content

Mullowney v. Masopust

Citations

  • 943 A.2d 1029
  • 2008 R.I. LEXIS 28
  • 2008 WL 732037

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing “the consumer protection purpose of the statute”; “[T]he Condominium Act contains a strong consumer protection flavor . . . .” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “With respect to the issue of attorneys’ fees, this Court will uphold a presiding judicial officer’s award of attorneys’ fees unless such award constitutes an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Flaherty, Suttell, Robinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Mullowney v. Masopust

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.