Skip to main content
· 8/19/1998

Mullis v. Speight Seed Farms, Inc.

Citations

  • 505 S.E.2d 818
  • 234 Ga. App. 27
  • 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 3244
  • 37 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 88
  • 1998 Ga. App. LEXIS 1136
  • 98 FCDR 3244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering cases from other jurisdictions to determine that a specific provision was unconscionable
  • applied the standard of review applicable to summary judgment in reversing the trial court and holding that the disclaimer of warranty and limitation of remedies provisions were unconscionable and unenforceable
  • “‘Sur- prise’ involves the extent to which the supposedly agreed-upon terms of the bargain are hidden in a prolix printed form drafted by the party seeking to enforce the disputed terms.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackburn, McMurray, Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.