· 8/19/1998
Mullis v. Speight Seed Farms, Inc.
Citations
- 505 S.E.2d 818
- 234 Ga. App. 27
- 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 3244
- 37 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 88
- 1998 Ga. App. LEXIS 1136
- 98 FCDR 3244
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering cases from other jurisdictions to determine that a specific provision was unconscionable
- applied the standard of review applicable to summary judgment in reversing the trial court and holding that the disclaimer of warranty and limitation of remedies provisions were unconscionable and unenforceable
- “‘Sur- prise’ involves the extent to which the supposedly agreed-upon terms of the bargain are hidden in a prolix printed form drafted by the party seeking to enforce the disputed terms.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blackburn, McMurray, Eldridge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.