Mullins v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court may not, consistent with Alaska R.Crim.P. 45, grant prosecution continuance to obtain absent witness unless witness’s testimony is important or necessary to the prosecution’s case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Russell v. Municipality of Anchorage
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1981-04-16· cited 34×
• Miller v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-09-13· cited 29×
• Velez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1988-10-07· cited 17×
• State v. R.H.
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-12-27· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Peterson v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1977-04-20· cited 55×
• Peterkin v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1975-12-01· cited 23×
• Batey v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-07-25· cited 16×
• Westdahl v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-03-30· cited 14×
• State v. Best
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-08-31· cited 11×
• People v. Watson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-03-31· cited 10×