Skip to main content

Mullins v. Pine Manor College

Citations

  • 449 N.E.2d 331
  • 389 Mass. 47
  • 1983 Mass. LEXIS 1417

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that college had a duty to protect a female student abducted from her campus dormitory and assaulted in another campus building
  • holding that, because negligence typically involves questions of fact, negligence actions are usually inappropriate for sum mary judgment
  • holding that the employee, the party directly at fault, may be held liable to the person harmed for the full amount of his loss
  • finding that a college that voluntarily provides security guards on campus must exercise reasonable care when it does so
  • recognizing duty where risk of harm to student \was not only foreseeable but was actually foreseen\
  • disregarding cases from jurisdictions relying on status of landowner to victim and relying on special relationship to form a special duty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Wilkins, Liacos, Nolan, O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

307 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.