Mullins v. Moberly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the petitioner failed to offer direct evidence to suggest that the testimony was knowingly false or that the witness \might have had a motive or interest in presenting perjured testimony\
• “[A] claimed violation of [N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 30.30] does not raise a federal constitutional claim and is therefore not cognizable on habeas review.”
• “[P]laintiff’s race-based hostile work environment claims are not plausibly pleaded because plaintiff offers little if any reason to believe defendants’ actions had anything to do with her race.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).