Mullins v. Local Boundary Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• election vote against incorporation mooted petitioner's appeal of the board's decision to grant the petition to put it on the ballot in the first place
• “A claim is moot . . . ‘if the party bringing the action would not be entitled to any relief even if it prevails.’ ” (quoting Ulmer v. Alaska Rest. & Beverage Ass’n, 33 P.3d 773, 776 (Alaska 2001))
• \'But the superior court's failure to allow {the appellant] adequate time to respond does not require a reversal of its decision. because [the appellant] can show no resulting prejudice.\ (citing Boggess v. State, 783 P.2d 1173, 1182 (Alaska App. 1989))
• “But the superior court’s failure to allow [the appellant] adequate time to respond does not require a reversal of its decision because [the appellant] can show no resulting prejudice.” (citing Boggess v. State, 783 P.2d 1173, 1182 (Alaska App. 1989))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).