Mullins v. Department of Law Enforcement

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that officer had no right to collaterally challenge effectiveness of his counsel in revocation of his law enforcement license proceedings
• holding when factual findings of administrative agency are reviewed, court must not substitute its judgment for that of agency in assessing weight of evidence or resolving disputed issues of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).