· 11/16/2010
Mullins v. City of New York
Citations
- 626 F.3d 47
- 16 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1636
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 23608
- 2010 WL 4609208
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the district court committed no error in considering, and relying on, hearsay testimony at the 1 ¶12.
- holding that a court may rely on affidavits, depositions, sworn testimony, and hearsay evidence in considering a motion for a preliminary injunction
- recognizing that a district court may rely on affidavits, depositions and sworn testimony in adjudicating a motion seeking preliminary injunctive relief
- holding that a court may rely on affidavits, depositions, sworn testimony, and hearsay evidence in considering a motion for a preliminary injunction
- holding that a court may rely on affidavits, depositions, sworn testimony, and hearsay evidence in considering a motion for a preliminary injunction
- holding that courts may consider hearsay evidence on motions for preliminary injunction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pooler, Katzmann, Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.