Skip to main content
· 11/16/2010

Mullins v. City of New York

Citations

  • 626 F.3d 47
  • 16 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1636
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 23608
  • 2010 WL 4609208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court committed no error in considering, and relying on, hearsay testimony at the 1 ¶12.
  • holding that a court may rely on affidavits, depositions, sworn testimony, and hearsay evidence in considering a motion for a preliminary injunction
  • recognizing that a district court may rely on affidavits, depositions and sworn testimony in adjudicating a motion seeking preliminary injunctive relief
  • holding that a court may rely on affidavits, depositions, sworn testimony, and hearsay evidence in considering a motion for a preliminary injunction
  • holding that a court may rely on affidavits, depositions, sworn testimony, and hearsay evidence in considering a motion for a preliminary injunction
  • holding that courts may consider hearsay evidence on motions for preliminary injunction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pooler, Katzmann, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.