Skip to main content
· 6/14/2010

Mullinax v. Astrue

Citations

  • 768 F. Supp. 2d 829
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58990
  • 2010 WL 2382560

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In at least four cases since May 2008, courts in this District have cautioned Mr. Martin against continuing to represent clients in the District of South Carolina without applying for pro hac vice admission in this District.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patrick Michael Duffy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.