Mulligan v. Mulligan
Citations
- 21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 89
Syllabus
<p>DIVORCE AND ALIMONY — ERROR.</p> <p>1. Setting Aside Rules Observed for Many Years that Impede Justice.</p> <p>Courts inherently have the right to protect themselves and the publie from fraud and perjury; hence, neither question of public policy nor rule, of court which protects and encourages perjury and fraud can be permitted' perpetually to impede justice, notwithstanding such rule has been observed for more than a half century and that courts reluctantly upset well-established rules.</p> <p>2. Divorce Decree Set Aside after Term for Fraud and Perjury.</p> <p>A decree of divorce obtained by fraud and perjury, on the facts being shown, may be set aside after the term at which the divorce was granted, and notwithstanding remarriage of the guilty party.</p> <p>[Syllabus approved by the court.]</p>
Judges: Donnelly, Hurin, Norris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Earle v. EarleIndiana Supreme Court· 1883-06-20· cited 81×
- Johnson v. ColemanWisconsin Supreme Court· 1868-10-15· cited 54×
- Caswell v. CaswellIllinois Supreme Court· 1887-03-23· cited 35×
- Bomsta v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1888-02-17· cited 28×
- McBlain v. McBlainCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-12-12· cited 26×
- Hansford v. HansfordMissouri Court of Appeals· 1889-02-19· cited 20×
- Smithson v. SmithsonNebraska Supreme Court· 1893-09-19· cited 19×
- Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1871-07-15· cited 18×
- Whittaker v. WhittakerIllinois Supreme Court· 1894-06-19· cited 15×
- Salisbury v. SalisburySupreme Court of Missouri· 1887-10-15· cited 14×
- Wisdom v. WisdomNebraska Supreme Court· 1888-07-15· cited 11×
- Stephens v. StephensTexas Supreme Court· 1884-11-07· cited 10×
- Miller v. MillerNew York Supreme Court· 1867-11-15· cited 9×
- O'Connell v. O'ConnellNebraska Supreme Court· 1880-07-15· cited 7×
- Greene v. GreeneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1854-10-15· cited 6×
- Bryant v. AustinSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1884-06-15· cited 5×
- Colby v. ColbySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1896-06-02· cited 4×
- Weidner v. WeidnerNew York Supreme Court· 1895-03-05· cited 3×
- Lucas v. LucasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1854-11-15· cited 3×
- Jewitt v. JewittNew York Supreme Court· 1888-09-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.